Parallel leaping is a rather confusing topic, because there are so many parallels. There was informal talk earlier tonight of earthquake predictions that came through one channeler, and of another channeler's view that computers are not trustworthy now. On which parallel are computers in trouble? On which parallel are the earthquake predictions relevant? And when we say we want you to straddle parallels—to be on a happier parallel sending through information and interacting with people on a less fulfilling parallel—is the lower parallel we're referring to the earthquake parallel or the parallel where the computers don't work? And do we really know the difference, or do anybody's guides, or is it all one big kaleidoscopic swirl right now with everyone trying to catch a glimpse and date probable events?
Logically, you can deduce that if you're being asked to straddle parallels in order to help leap more people over, the parallel you're helping to leap people from has to have enough clear-eyed, surviving, somewhat coherently-thinking people, for you to even be able to make a difference there. In other words, you're not bridging to the worst parallels, by any means. You're bridging to the ones you can help. And we made that plural on purpose—it's not just one. You are spanning several right now, and you can probably feel that. It's a little disorienting at times. Even physically, dizziness can be a symptom.
In some ways you get to choose what parallels you're working with by resonating with them by knowing certain people you want to reach who are on those parallels. But you may end up working primarily with parallels that you haven't been living on, that may not even involve most of your friends, in the bigger picture of reaching out worldwide. In fact, you may be bridging back to parallels that are a little ahead of where most of your friends are, unfortunately.
So be very careful with other people's predictions. Be very careful even with our predictions. Which parallel are we talking about? We can't really number them, or give them alphabet letters. They're not firm enough for that.
We think you have some gut experience of the leap, but it still sounds pretty darn theoretical, when it comes right down to it. There's an enthusiasm in talking to people about it, and there's also a hesitation that this sounds so abstract and you can't prove it as having relevance, and it can be slightly embarrassing when people seem to not grok at all what you're talking about. It's not like you've become well established on the new parallel to which you're moving. We've told you we'll leapfrog you for some time, so you won't have a strong frame of reference from which to look back.
How can we make this information almost a parallel itself? It's a world of meaning. It's a concept capsule. We're spinning a mythology. We're spinning the archetype of the parallel leap. It's like an Alice in Wonderland mythology, that you can leap.
This is what reality is—a series of intersecting mythologies that someone believes enough that it fills out. It becomes very experiential, and it catches on with enough people that mass consciousness then holds that idea strongly and lives it. What is communism? It's an abstract concept. What is the movie industry? It was an idea in somebody's head that involves millions of people now, and it's hard to imagine not having the movie industry. It's an abstract idea to think of having performers act out stories so really that people almost feel like the movie they watched was a dream they had, or something they lived through. Movies can seem much more real than plays ever could, where you'd hear the guy sitting beside you burp and you couldn't get totally lost in what's happening on stage.
So we're spinning a mythology that there are parallels, that you can parallel leap, that we exist, and that we can help you. That you exist. That you can be re-created as almost a different being altogether, but still with enough continuity that you can enjoy the ride. If we could get enough consensus about this, it would be real. If we could do this as big as we would like, there would be nobody left on the old parallels, so all those predictions would be wrong. Who would be there to care about the computers crashing or not crashing? That parallel would have no humans, just computers sitting there malfunctioning. [laughs]
We realize that what we're asking you to co-create with us is quite an undertaking. But speaking of movies, look at the influential movies of the past century. One idea in a movie can greatly change what people expect their lives to be like, or even cause them to look back at past events with a whole new interpretation.
We are intrinsic to everyone, having been co-creators of everyone's experience. We're speaking to try to find something in everyone that we can awaken, so that people can hear our message. We are in everyone. From that standpoint, it's quite an easy task. It's like the concept of God. If everyone is a part of God, and there's nothing that isn't God, then if you come up with a concept of God, it's got a pretty good chance of flying in some linguistic articulation or another. We're almost as ubiquitous, because this age is ready for this information, is ready to learn what makes things tick.
You've gone to the atomic level, the subatomic level, and the superatomic level. How many ways can you look at matter? You've probed about as much as you can, and you've discovered philosophical implications in that search. Questions are up that have to do with how things come into incarnation. Is there meaning in the inception of anything that exists? Is there anything that makes a clone more or less alive than something that was created in a natural way? And it's none too soon that these questions are finally arising, instead of people taking for granted birth, death, birth, death, which is automatic. If you look behind the scenes of many of the philosophical questions of this day, you see us, the forces of incarnation. And you see mass consciousness. Certainly, mass marketing points to the question of, is there such a thing as mass consciousness? Even the mass marketers know that it's a more than just a matter of statistics as to why certain ideas seem to catch on at the same time in different places around the world.
We want to reframe reaching people as being easy in this age, especially when you're very aware of mass consciousness. We feel that what is coming through in these channelings is being drawn through by the questions of the day, and the philosophical implications of what you see happening in the world. We are just what's behind the scenes, and now what is behind the scenes is taking its voice and speaking through this channeler and many channelers. As we have said many times, nature has been holding space for the whole game of manifestation, and now nature is choosing, almost as if it has free will. It has gone from background to actor in the drama much more than in the past. And when we say "in the drama," obviously we're talking about in the human drama. In human consciousness, nature is coming to the foreground much more than it has been in recent millennia.
So all we're asking you to do is to crystallize into soundbites and jingles what is already happening in the human psyche. That's all. So be playful, be creative, and be outrageous if you wish.
If we say we want you to reach back into a lower dimensional parallel from a higher parallel, let's focus on that higher parallel. Don't you think the ones on the lower parallel are going to want to hear your message more if you're really having a good time on the new parallel, having leapt? Really having a great richness of experience and joy? And so we think that should be your focus more than oh gosh, are there gonna be earthquakes and how much death.
Meeting with us can be a higher dimensional oasis, if you choose it to be. We'd like to meet you in a high vibration, and not in the lower ones. We hesitate to use words like higher/lower, but the denser, the more-in-polarity tends to be a little less pleasant in the way that it has been used as of late. We'd like to meet you on more refined planes of experience. We would love for this to be really joyful.
We love you all very dearly. Things can change in an instant. We think half of the questions people ask will seem irrelevant once the joy sets in—once you get that in your field. And it will seem very playful to try to reach the old parallel. It won't seem like a difficult drudgery thing. We are kind of talking about being Santa Claus—how can we interest the children in the lower dimensions in Santa Claus? Does that sound like a hard thing to do?
If the world feels like a place of drudgery, it might mean that your weight is more on your foot in the higher realms than on your foot in the lower realms, and there's a big contrast. Keep a foot in the lower realms for awhile to reach people with the leap opportunity. But come play with us as much as you can.
from Spinning a Parallel Leap Mythology to:
Part One table of contents
Parallel Worlds Leap Handbook intro
© Cathee Courter and Peter MacGill, photos and text. All rights reserved.
You may copy and distribute this message as long as you change nothing, credit the author(s), include this copyright notice and web address, and keep it free of charge.